wisconsin
StatLine IQ is a proprietary composite rating modeled on the intelligence IQ scale. Rather than relying on a single stat like ERA or batting average, each score synthesizes multiple performance dimensions into one number β making it easy to compare players across different strengths. A score of 100 represents the league average; every 15 points is one standard deviation above or below.
Balanced strategy: your best overall hitter is promoted to the 2-hole per modern run-expectancy research.
5 platoon opportunity(ies) identified β see platoons for details.
Danielle Lucey is close to Hannah Conger for #1 β consider platoon
Hannah Conger is close to Hannah Conger for #1 β consider platoon
Alivia Bark is close to Hannah Conger for #1 β consider platoon
Danielle Lucey is close to Emily Bojan for #2 β consider platoon
Emily Bojan is close to Emily Bojan for #2 β consider platoon
5 platoon opportunity(ies) identified β see platoons for details.
Danielle Lucey is close to Hannah Conger for #1 β consider platoon
Hannah Conger is close to Hannah Conger for #1 β consider platoon
Alivia Bark is close to Hannah Conger for #1 β consider platoon
Danielle Lucey is close to Alivia Bark for #2 β consider platoon
Hannah Conger is close to Alivia Bark for #2 β consider platoon
wOBA Optimized: Players placed by tier using estimated softball linear weights. Tier 1 (slots 1,2,4) are your 3 best run-producers.
5 platoon opportunity(ies) identified β see platoons for details.
Danielle Lucey is close to Kendra Lewis for #1 β consider platoon
Emily Bojan is close to Kendra Lewis for #1 β consider platoon
Emma King is close to Kendra Lewis for #1 β consider platoon
Kendra Lewis is close to Kendra Lewis for #1 β consider platoon
Hannah Conger is close to Kendra Lewis for #1 β consider platoon
5 platoon opportunity(ies) identified β see platoons for details.
Danielle Lucey is close to Hannah Conger for #1 β consider platoon
Hannah Conger is close to Hannah Conger for #1 β consider platoon
Alivia Bark is close to Hannah Conger for #1 β consider platoon
Hannah Conger is close to Alivia Bark for #2 β consider platoon
Alivia Bark is close to Alivia Bark for #2 β consider platoon
5 platoon opportunity(ies) identified β see platoons for details.
Danielle Lucey is close to Hannah Conger for #1 β consider platoon
Hannah Conger is close to Hannah Conger for #1 β consider platoon
Makenzie Foster is close to Hannah Conger for #1 β consider platoon
Alivia Bark is close to Hannah Conger for #1 β consider platoon
Danielle Lucey is close to Emily Bojan for #2 β consider platoon